A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Clinical psychologists are frequently called on to testify in court regarding mental health issues in civil or criminal cases. One of the legal criteria by which admissibility of testimony is determined includes whether the testimony is based on methods that have gained "general acceptance" in their field. In this study, we sought to evaluate the psychological tests used in forensic assessments by members of the American Psychology-Law Society Division of the American Psychological Association, and by diplomates in the American Board of Forensic Psychology. We present test results from this survey, based on 152 respondents, for forensic evaluations conducted with adults using multiscale inventories, single-scale tests, unstructured personality tests, cognitive and/or intellectual tests, neuropsychological tests, risk assessment and psychopathy instruments, sex offender risk assessment instruments, competency or sanity-related instruments, and instruments used to evaluate malingering. In addition, we provide findings for psychological testing involving child-related forensic issues.
منابع مشابه
Forensic use and abuse of psychological tests: multiscale inventories.
316 July 2003 Properly used, many psychological tests are very useful diagnostic and clinical tools. They often clarify ambiguous information, elicit previously unavailable data, and add objectivity, validity, and reliability to patient interactions and record reviews. Unfortunately, some instruments do not live up to these objectives, especially in forensic cases and/or in the hands of those w...
متن کاملProblems of the Comprehensive System for the Rorschach in Forensic Settings: Recent Developments
The Comprehensive System for the Rorschach is currently the subject of heated controversy among psychologists. Much “common knowledge” about the test is either incorrect or in dispute. Psychologists who use the Rorschach in forensic settings can often be successfully challenged by well-informed attorneys and may risk becoming the subject of ethics complaints. This article identifies seven issue...
متن کاملProtecting raw data and psychological tests from wrongful disclosure: a primer on the law and other persuasive strategies.
Psychologists must advocate for more stringent legal protection of psychological test materials because using standardized tests is the most distinguishing and exclusive feature of psychological evaluation practice. With the rapid growth in forensic consulting, unrestrained discovery of raw data and psychological test materials during litigation erodes the reliability and validity of the test p...
متن کاملThe ethical confrontation of the unethical forensic colleague.
In the course of clinical and forensic work, psychologists sometimes discover serious weaknesses in knowledge, performance, or ethics in other psychologists' work. The ethical code of the American Psychological Association mandates confronting such a psychologist prior to making a professional complaint. This mandatory confrontation typically is omitted because of a sense of awkwardness or a fe...
متن کاملPerceptions of the Validity and Utility of Criminal Profiling Among Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists
Criminal profiling is the process of using crime scene evidence to make inferences about potential suspects, including personality characteristics and psychopathology. An exploratory Internet survey of forensic psychologists and psychiatrists was conducted to examine their experiences with and opinions about profiling and to determine whether referring to profiling as “criminal investigative an...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of personality assessment
دوره 87 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006